“I will raise up for them a prophet like you from among their fellow Israelites, and I will put my words in his mouth. He will tell them everything I command him” (Deuteronomy 18).

The law, also referred to as the Law of Moses, is found in four of the five Pentateuchal books: Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy. The law not only functions as the covenantal terms God established with ancient Israel, which includes both God’s expectations of His people and what the people could expect from God, but the Torah also reveals the character of Yahweh, which undergirds our modern theological understanding and biblical application. “For I am the Lord who brought you up out of the land of Egypt to be your God. You shall therefore be holy, for I am holy” (Leviticus 11:45).[1] Deuteronomy defines how the people of Israel could enjoy relationship with a holy God by issuing various edicts for obedience by which the covenant would be upheld: “You shall surely destroy all the places where the nations whom you shall dispossess served their gods, on the high mountains and on the hills and under every green tree” (Deuteronomy 12:2). But the Pentateuch also imparts a vision of a Messiah priest-king, which some observe as having been woven into its compositional strategy;[2] for example, consider Moses’ words in Deuteronomy 18: “The Lord your God will raise up for you a prophet like me from among you, from your fellow Israelites. You must listen to him” (15), and “I will raise up for them a prophet like you from among their fellow Israelites, and I will put my words in his mouth. He will tell them everything I command him” (18).
Although there are various reasons why the book of Deuteronomy is interpreted as supporting a perception of legality, beginning with its name meaning “second law,” Daniel I. Block devotes chapter three of his book, The Gospel according to Moses: Theological and Ethical Reflections on the Book of Deuteronomy, to presenting an impassioned argument that the dominate voice heard is not that of a lawgiver. According to Block, the theological function of Deuteronomy is actually more pastoral than legal, as the genre and illocutionary intent suggest ascribing sermonic features to Moses’ speeches.[3] Emerging from the theological intent, Block juxtapositions Mosaic law again, but now pragmatically, by stating that Deuteronomy functions as “an invitation to an ongoing relationship with YHWH through feasting and fellowshipping in his presence.”[4] Moses challenges his congregation “never to forget YHWH’s saving and providential grace, and never to forget the economically marginalized in the community.”[5] Block sees Deuteronomy as much more than a “manifesto on polity” or a “legal code establishing the boundaries of Israel’s behavior.” On the contrary, the text is a declaration to a beloved community of faith as depicted in 14:2: “For you are a people holy to the Lord your God, and the Lord has chosen you to be a people for his treasured possession, out of all the peoples who are on the face of the earth.” “And if you call on him as Father who judges impartially according to each one’s deeds, conduct yourselves with fear throughout the time of your exile, knowing that you were ransomed from the futile ways inherited from your forefathers, not with perishable things such as silver or gold, but with the precious blood of Christ, like that of a lamb without blemish or spot” (1 Peter 1:17-19). Setting aside legalistic perceptions and viewing Deuteronomy through the lens of grace, a pastoral exhortation arising from the gospel within its pages becomes unmistakable.
“What then shall we say? That the law is sin? By no means! Yet if it had not been for the law, I would not have known sin. For I would not have known what it is to covet if the law had not said, ‘You shall not covet’” (Romans 7:7). Paul describes theological and pragmatic functions of the law, similarly to those advocated by Block; the law convicts of sin, and as a result, exposes our need for a Savior.[6] Therefore, no legitimate conflict exists between Mosaic law and the gospel of grace, because the Torah is a gracious gift that provided OT saints a “reminder of YHWH’s deliverance, his power, his covenant faithfulness, and the way of life and prosperity.”[7] “Did that which is good, then, bring death to me? By no means! It was sin, producing death in me through what is good, in order that sin might be shown to be sin, and through the commandment might become sinful beyond measure” (Romans 7:13). Paul makes the case that the intention of the law was never to be a means of salvation (Acts 13:39; Romans 3:20; Galatians 2:16); rather, the Torah always pointed to the gospel of grace through Christ (Galatians 3:24), and it is through this lens one preaches Deuteronomy in a manner that reflects its canonical intention.
A prevalent misconception is that Paul imparts that Christians are no longer required to “keep the law”[8], but that is ambiguous, and I contend requires further elaboration. “For what the law was powerless to do because it was weakened by the flesh, God did by sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh to be a sin offering. And so he condemned sin in the flesh, in order that the righteous requirement of the law might be fully met in us, who do not live according to the flesh but according to the Spirit” (Romans 8:3-4). I believe that this misconception is a misunderstanding and over simplification of the apostle’s intent. Fortunately, Paul clarifies that the law could not produce God’s righteous requirements in us, because it was weakened by the flesh; however, through faith in Christ, holy living is the result of a Spirit-centered life in Christ. Authors, Walter A. Elwell and Robert W. Brough offer a perspective echoing Paul, “But it would be a mistake to conclude that obeying God is no longer important because salvation is through faith, not good works. Paul opposes works when viewed as the Galatian false teachers viewed them: as deeds that earn salvation.”9 Christians, therefore, are concerned about a “salvation that works” not a salvation by works.[10 What is more, Christians certainly do have a new disposition toward the law than that of their OT counterparts, because Christians know Christ personally as its fulfillment. The law of God is written on their hearts just as it was written on the hearts of the Old Testament faithful.[11] Consider Simeon and Anna, for example, who were waiting in the temple court for the fulfillment of the Pentateuchal messianic vision.[12]
For the modern Christian, the law serves both as a reminder of the impossible task of living up to God’s holiness, which leads me to rejoice in God’s forgiveness and grace. So, whenever I turn the other cheek, forgive my enemy, or give to the needy, I do not do so by the law, but by the Spirit, and by the Spirit, I uphold the law.
[1] Unless otherwise noted, all biblical passages referenced are in the English Standard Version.
[2] John H. Sailhamer, The Meaning of the Pentateuch: Revelation, Composition, and Interpretation (Grand Rapids, MI: Intervarsity Press Academic, 2009), 236.
[3] Daniel I. Block, The Gospel according to Moses: Theological and Ethical Reflections on the Book of Deuteronomy (Eugene, OR: Cascade Books, 2012), 79.
[4] Ibid., 99.
[5] Ibid., 101.
[6] William MacDonald, Believer’s Bible Commentary (NT), (Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, 2016), 1701.
[7] Block, 130.
[8] Ibid., 131.
9 Walter A. Elwell and Robert W. Brough, Encountering the New Testament: A Historical and Theological Survey, 3rd Edition (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic a division of Baker Publishing Group, 2013), 284.
[10] Block, 136.
[11] Ibid., 132.
[12] Sailhamer, 235.
To view all posts, click/press the link here to visit the Amazing Tangled Grace main page.
Please take a moment to like Amazing Tangled Grace on Facebook by clicking/pressing here to visit the page.
Please Subscribe to follow my blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. God bless!
I really enjoy the Book of Deuteronomy because without the law and our inability to follow it completely, we would not have needed a Savior. Without the Savior, we would be all doomed to eternity separated from God. God had a plan from the beginning and the law was part of it. What a marvelous and awesome God we serve!
LikeLiked by 2 people
So true!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you. Brilliant. And you are so right. Like everything else in the Bible from front to back, it is a gospel of grace and Jesus is the focus. Had the law not been given, we would not understand our need for Jesus, our Lord and Savior. God bless.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you. I couldn’t agree more. In the next week or so, I’m going to explore this further looking at the Old and New Testaments. God bless you as well!
LikeLike
Enjoying these deep dives into Christianity. My husband and I are fortunate to have our pastor lead our Sunday School classes and I’m finding good food for thought to share. Thanks!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you and God bless you both!
LikeLike
Reblogged this on BASIC CHRISTIANITY (even for "Spiritual Dummies") and commented:
“One cannot always tell what it is that keeps us shut in, confines us, seems to bury us, but still one feels certain barriers, certain gates, certain walls. is all this imagination, fantasy?”
https://craigsquotes.wordpress.com/category/andre-agassi/
https://craigsbooks.wordpress.com/2022/01/13/and-as-imagination-bodies-forth-the-forms-of-things-unknown-the-poets-pen/
https://craigsbooks.wordpress.com/2022/01/20/ernest-hemingway-quotes-goodreads-craigs-quotes/
Hi
Thanks for more follows
IF you want to go on a journey (destination unknown), you can follow me. Thanks and enjoy the trip.
happy travelling
“Sleepy-head” craig (here in “Sleepy Hollow”)
“I travel not to go anywhere, but to go. I travel for travel’s sake. The great affair is to move.
– Robert Louis Stevenson
http://www.craigsquotes.wordpress.com + my third book ‘Here, There and Everywhere’
“Do not go where the path may lead. Go where there is no path and leave a trail”
-Emerson
of confusion + CHAOS (at least in the “real world” and hopefully NOT cyberspace too)
“the going nowhere (fast) man”
“Information and Inspiration Distributer, Incorrigible Encourager and People-builder *
* not bridges (thank goodness)!
Well my family and friends say I’m “safest” just writing and sharing
“Mr Do-little”
http://www.craigsbooks.wordpress.com
PPS
Don’t worry about the world ending today…its already tomorrow in scenic and tranquil ‘little’ New Zealand
LikeLiked by 1 person
You shall surely destroy all the places where the nations whom you shall dispossess served their gods, on the high mountains and on the hills and under every green tree” (Deuteronomy 12:2)
Is this God commanding “his” people to invade and murder people from other nations? People that don’t follow their “God”? This is one of many things in the Bible that I do not understand, how a so-called “God of love” can be so evil? Look at what happened in Jericho, men, women, children, elderly, animals, they were all murdered. Why?
In my opinion, warlords wrote those verses and told the soldiers that was God’s words. Best way to convince a soldier to cut the throat of a kid.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good afternoon. I appreciate your observation and question, as I have wrestled with them. Leaving the link below is not an attempt to side stepping responding myself, but rather, it’s a pretty good, though high level, explanation of OT violence. The only thing that I’ll add is that God is best understood through the lens of Calvary. Again, thank you for stopping by my page and sharing your thoughts!
https://www.gotquestions.org/Old-Testament-violence.html
LikeLike
I read the article, and it is interesting. The writer says “the opponents of Christianity” are harsh critics of the violence in the OT. Well not all of us are opponents of it, some of us are just trying to make sense of Christianity, to make sense of a book that contradicts itself a lot. Try to separate what was written under the inspiration of God and what was written by evil men. What really happened and what is pure mythology.
Once a Baptist pastor told me: “If you start to make too many questions, everything that is written in the Bible will crumble. You just have to accept.”
Some of us will not.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I want to thank you for how respectfully and candidly you presented your view. I would like to pray and contemplate on this further.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for visiting my blog. Excellent writing on Deuteronomy. IMO God’s love for us is through and through in this book, His thoughts, and intentions, wisdom and beautiful heart toward us mere and unworthy beings makes this a book to study further.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for your kind words, amen to your praise of God!
LikeLike
I really appreciate the work that you do, and the likes that you put on my posts; thank you very much
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re welcome! I enjoy what others are writing and sharing! Thank you so much for your encouragement.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you very much
LikeLiked by 1 person
Paul tried to convince the Jews that Jesus was greater than Moses and a covenant of faith was the New Covenant and despite that Jesus said he did not come to replace the Law as He posited, the covenant of faith and spirit was a replacement. His best argument was that Abraham was alive long before Moses and there was no Law then as Abraham practiced the covenant of faith and spirit. So Paul argued that the new Christian way actually reverted to the original practice that Abraham practiced. Luther argued that the Law resulted in creating sins. So many rules make it impossible not to sin. But the way through Jesus was simpler and more spiritual than following rules.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It seems Paul was not very successful with the Jews as he also preached that circumcision was not necessary as such was a mark made by man not God so therefore insignificant. Paul also preached among the Gentiles and presented the the promise God made to Abraham about his descendants multiplying the descendants were not only Jews but all people. Jews felt Abraham’s descendants referred to future Jews only. The Jews also disputed that the Messiah was available to all people but the Jews believed the Messiah would be the “property” of the Jews only. All these things seemed very radical ideas since the Jews had followed the Law and other practices for many centuries and many were not buying into Paul’s preachings. The Jews of Jerusalem were adamant about keeping the old ways and it has been suggested that Peter had a difficult commission convinced them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
To me the people who cross my life’s path are the foundation to relationship with God. I see bits and pieces of myself in them which teaches me to ‘mortify your fleshly deeds.’ My life in Christ-come-in-my-flesh is via our ongoing conversations.
LikeLike